You would not believe the amount of mischief that is performed under the guise of “good for farms/farmers/farming,” … This year, I have emerged from the fog of summer labour to realize that a new farmers’ market proposal for the City of Vancouver has entered a much more serious planning stage. A study of the preliminary business plan for the New City Market suggests to me that all the farms in B.C. making a living selling at Vancouver farmers’ markets will be required to become suppliers of their own retail store — complete with massive overhead, more time away from the farm and an erosion of the consumer/producer connection that we have strived so hard to create.

Not good for this farmer.

Born out of the reasonable, fervent and long-held desire for surety when it comes to space for farmers’ markets (for which I would happily pay more in stall fees), the New City Market proposal has become a behemoth of meeting rooms, marketing and storage facilities, eateries and distribution hubs in addition to a multi-day, dawn-to-dusk farmers’ market. Gone would be the four-hour markets where we can get to the city and back in a day, fitting everything we need into one 12-foot trailer, trading potatoes for money with the people who are going to eat them.

When I came across the initial proposal a year ago, I really didn’t think something so cumbersome and costly would ever get off the ground. Shocked was I to discover this week that there is now a fully-funded preliminary business plan document most egregiously boasting of increased access to less expensive, local food.

Make our food cheaper? Are you kidding me? We are supposed to lower prices on top of changing the entire business plan of the farm?

I fired off a letter to the project leaders that signalled the commencement of a good bit of rabble rousing that might last at least until spring thaw. The time has come to wield the large stick grown of almost 20 years attendance at the Vancouver farmers’ markets.

SPIN farming secrets are out

November 16th, 2011

Wally Sastzewich and Roxanne Christiansen have just published two how-to manuals for their amazing Small Plot Intensive (SPIN) growing system: “Step by step learning guides to the sub-acre production system that makes it possible to gross $50,000 from a half-acre.”
http://bit.ly/v9IxuS. It’s expensive, but if you’re serious about commercial growing, it’s a potent investment.

http://www.cityfarmer.info/2011/11/09/vigilante-gardener-in-brooklyn-ny-2-part-video/

With Studio 4 host Fanny Kiefer
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2IiOC_6cxg

Food security is marching up the priority list in cities around the world, and smart politicians are joining the movement.

Growing more food in our cities harms no one, and spins off myriad benefits: better diet, lower health care costs, beautification, safer neighbourhoods, safer food, inter-cultural and inter-generational integration, increased food security, exercise, increased property values near community gardens, less hunger, and, yes, commercial enterprises.

The commercial potential is greatest in desperate, shrinking cities like Detroit, but that isn’t stopping cities everywhere from promoting urban farming any way they can. New York just passed legislation that will, like Seattle, exempt rooftop greenhouses from height limits. New York is also making data about whether city-owned property is suitable for urban agriculture publicly available, and it’s mandating city jails and health centres to buy more locally grown food. Urban farming in New York is growing at what one city councilor there described as “an astounding rate”.

Citizens, schools, community centres, seniors’ centres, hospitals and neighbourhood groups, architects, planners and a new breed of commercial urban farmers are jumping into local food growing with a vengeance. Politicians should be making this good work easier, and respecting it in every way possible.

Fighting this tide can be dangerous to political health. While Victoria has joined a growing list of cities that allow commercial sales of produce grown on city lots, Lantzville, near Nanaimo on Vancouver Island, has attracted international outrage for persecuting urban farmers. Lantzville resident Dirk Becker and his partner Nicole Shaw live on a 2.5-acre residentially-zoned lot and make $20,000 a year at farmers’ markets selling produce grown on their property. While Becker has lovingly restored the property by piling up sawdust and compost to replace the original soil that was mined and sold by the previous owner, his neighbour prefers the manicured estate look of the golf course that abuts both their properties. The neighbour has the ear of the local council, which last fall ordered Becker and Shaw to “remove all piles of soil and manure” from their property and boulevard and “cease all agricultural activities”. The order was based on a bylaw that says, vaguely, that residentially-zoned properties cannot “grow crops”.

Becker’s case has drawn hundreds of his supporters to public meetings and attracted international attention, positioning Lantzville as a gross aberration of a sustainable town, where petty partisan process trumps common sense. Why would a town on an island where 95% of food is imported not do everything possible to encourage local food production?

The mayor counters that he and his council are concerned about manure and woodchip deliveries to the property, encroachment on the neighbour’s property, traffic and water supply contamination—all non-issues from what I can tell. The dispute is, unbelievably, headed for the courts.

I drove down the dead end road to Becker’s semi-rural property last month, and found it to be neatly kept, odourless, and totally alive with squash, beans, chard, raspberries, carrots, potatoes and myriad other foods. To consider it a blight on the neighbourhood would require a massive stretch of the imagination and an unhealthy sprinkling of bad blood between neighbours.

“Most of us in the well-fed world give little thought to where our food comes from or how it is grown,” writes Charles Siebert in the July, 2011 issue of National Geographic. “We steer our shopping carts down supermarket aisles without realizing that the apparent bounty is a shiny stage set held up by increasingly shaky scaffolding.”

People are responding by growing more, not less, food in cities everywhere. Successful politicians will be out in front of this parade.

This column originally appeared in the Sept. 20, 2011 issue of Business in Vancouver, www.biv.com.

Peter Ladner’s book, The Urban Food Revolution, Changing the Way We Feed Cities, appears in bookstores Nov. 7, 2011, published by New Society, www.newsociety.com. Advance orders here.

Vancouver Park Board’s plan to rebuild the roof of the West End Community Centre to incorporate a community garden is a great way to produce hobby food and wonderful social benefits, but it’s an indicator of a market that is opening up for local food production on a much more serious commercial scale.

When Choices customers pop a $4.98 clamshell of Ecospirit spinach into their cart, they’re helping seed a new enterprise that is about to transform the way we grow our food. Ecospirit spinach is licensed by the Squamish First Nation (an early investor), produced by Terrasphere Systems in a prototype automated greenhouse in Surrey, partly owned by Boston-based Converted Organics. It uses indoor-growing technology developed by those dedicated horticulturalists in B.C.’s marijuana industry, who are now churning out 600 pounds of greens a day for Choices and IGA.

Terrasphere isn’t alone. Long-time hydroponic grow-op sellers B.C. Northern Lights have developed an in-home herb and micro-green grow-box (“the kitchen cultivator”) that can fit under the counter like a small fridge that just keeps replacing what you take out of it—“a living spice rack”.

Coming from the more conventional side of the street, Stephen Fane, former CEO of locally-based Hot House Growers, is now CEO of Valcent Products. It’s a Vancouver-based company that’s taken over technology developed in the UK, where a Valcent vertical greenhouse has been successfully growing lettuce for the animals in the Devon Zoo for two years and is now setting up with a major food processor. Christopher Ng, former Lululemon Supply Chain Officer, is the company’s chief operating officer.

They’re still raising capital for a roll-out of installations, but Fane says the interest in his technology is “spectacular”. Time Magazine named it one of the 50 top innovations in 2009.

And why not? Every time oil prices go up, imported—and exported– food becomes more expensive. With the average food item being shipped 2,000 km., growing close to home guarantees big savings on shipping, as much as $1 per head of lettuce—not to mention attractive societal benefits of less traffic, lower emissions, less waste and decreased greenhouse gas emissions. Hydroponic growing uses about 5% of the water needed for field crops, at a time when critical water supplies for field agriculture are dwindling in volume and rising in price. One acre of hydroponic greenhouse can produce 600,000 pounds of food per year, 10 times what a one-acre field could produce, with no wasted petroleum-dependent fertilizer.

There’s another advantage to fresh-picked produce. It has far more nutritional value, which is one reason why local food was the #1 trend in the Canadian restaurant industry last year. Fane says a leafy green loses more than half its nutritional value within four days after it has been picked. With no chemicals or pesticides involved in hydroponic growing, food safety is also improved.

The Forbes 2020 team of experts and authors predicts that by the year 2018, 20% of all food consumed in U.S. cities will come from rooftop and parking lot farms. All the major supermarket chains are looking at this now, with four rooftop greenhouses already under construction in the U.S. A one-acre rooftop farm costs around $2 million to set up, and can gross over $1 million a year. On a do-it-yourself scale, one calculation shows that most of a family’s fresh vegetable needs could be met by a 50-sq. ft. indoor hydroponic garden. One 600-watt light could cover the tomatoes and peppers, and two 400-watt lamps could cover the lettuce and herbs.

For architects and planners aimed at the new post-LEED Living Building standards, food production is a natural. Harnessing technology and dodging seasonal variations in production removes the biggest barrier to commercial local food production—unreliability.

The Lower Mainland’s constrained land base and—let’s admit it—extensive experience with growing indoors with minimal power, make this a great fit for this region, one that would put real meaning into Green Capital.

This column first appeared in Business in Vancouver newspaper. Peter Ladner’s book, The Urban Food Revolution, Changing the Way We Feed Cities, is available in bookstores Nov. 7, 2011 (www.newsociety.com/Books/U/The-Urban-Food-Revolution).

Hear urban agriculture superstar Michael Ableman’s views on what it would take to achieve food security for Greater Vancouver. Please come– and pass this along to others who might be interested.

Planning Metro Vancouver as if Food Matters

Wed. Oct. 21, 2-4 pm, Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre (East- under the sails). Registration: included with Gaining Ground Summit registration (www.gaingroundsummit.com), or $65 plus GST for this event only—(https://confreg.uvcs.uvic.ca/?cid=1639 or call 1-250-472-4747.)

Why is food security important?

What would a bio-regional agri-food system look like?

What do we still need to know to develop a food security plan for the Lower Mainland?

What would have to change to implement such a plan?

Where are we making progress?


Moderator Peter Ladner, SFU Centre for Dialogue, former Vancouver City Councillor and Vice Chair, Metro Vancouver


Michael Ableman, author (Fields of Plenty, On Good Land, Beyond Organic) organic farmer (Foxglove Farm, Centre for Art, Ecology and Agriculture), founder Center for Urban Agriculture, Fairview California

o What would it take to achieve food security in Greater Vancouver?


Kent Mullinex, Institute for Sustainable Horticulture, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, former commercial orchard grower

o Food sovereignty: model for a bio-regional agri-food system

o Knowledge gaps


Harold Steves, Rancher, Richmond Councillor, Chair, Metro Vancouver Agriculture Committee

o Land use crunch: land and food needs of a growing population

o Update on Metro Vancouver’s food security plans


Dianne Watts, Mayor of the City of Surrey (invited)

o Surrey’s initiatives to integrate food production into city infrastructure

As we head deeper into August, spare a kind thought for all the politicians who are taking a rare breather this month.

I know– kind thoughts for politicians are very uncool. How much more fun it is to join the mindless slagging of politicians, the last group that it’s still “politically correct” to malign from the safety and comfort of your Lazee Boy.

I got an email the other day from a friend, filled with the predictable “jokes” about politicians. You know, Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself. — Mark Twain. Ha ha ha.


Maybe members of the U.S. Congress are idiots, but not the ones I’ve met. Having been a municipal politician and longtime business networker, I’ve met a lot of politicians at all levels. Few, if any, would I describe as idiots. Misguided, stupid, wrong, self-interested, egotistical, narrow-minded— all of these at times. But show me anyone who hasn’t also deserved those descriptors from time to time.


In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a Congress. — John Adams. Ha ha ha.


News flash: governing these days is immensely difficult, tiring and often unrewarding work. Since I have been evicted from public office I am even more sympathetic with those who remain, who are willing to wheel through three crowded dinners a night wearing a big smile and an open hand-shake, who get paid peanuts to endure hours of tedious public hearings where the same people wag the same fingers with the same misguided, occasionally stupid, wrong, self-interested, egotistical, narrow-minded arguments.


Sitting on my blanket at this year’s Vancouver Folk Festival I remembered being in the same place last year during the Vancouver mayoralty campaign, how I had to wear an embarrassing baseball hat and shirt with my name on it, how I had to do everything I could to make people think well of me, how I had to keep calculating whether my time was better spent here or somewhere else where I could get more political traction or raise more money, how I had no right to just sit and enjoy the music and ambience, how I was on duty all the time, how I had to take calls about what my opponents were up to, thinking about being at home catching up on sleep, or how I should be walking up to people’s houses and knocking on their doors in the blistering summer heat with a team of plucky volunteers.

This year I just swallowed up the harmonies and did whatever I felt like doing. Freedom. Bliss. No one scowling or snarling at me. Relief.


I don’t make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
– Will Rogers


Would you want to be running this city, province or country right now? Or sitting in opposition playing Gotcha and planning your outfits for the summer community festival parades? If yes, step right up. Every political party needs you. Don’t worry if you have a chequered past, because they’re going to classify you as a criminal anyway, even though getting photographed at a party making an off-colour grope is “crime” enough to finish your political career.


There is no distinctly native American criminal class… save Congress. — Mark Twain.


So when you’re tossing out that mailer from your MLA, deleting the invitation to the summer barbeque with your MP, or wondering whether to pass along the latest email about stupid politicians, pause instead and give thanks to all the hard-working politicians who had the guts to step up to the public abuse, numbing travel schedules and constant scrutiny because they wanted to make your world a better place—while you get to sit on the beach in peace and privacy.

Great article by Doug Todd in the Vancouver Sun today (Aug. 13) about how to make cycling safer. In particular, it mentions a simple change that could make a world of difference for cyclists: put cycling lanes between parked cars and the curb, not outside the parked cars as they are now.

In other words, look at cycling lanes as an expansion of the sidewalk, not as part of the main road. Pedestrians are protected by the curb. The benefit is that cyclists have a shield of parked cars between them and moving traffic. Very simple. Why not?

One advantage is that it will reduce cyclists getting “doored” because far more doors open on the driver’s side of a parked car than on the passenger’s side.

Dunbar Street is a perfect place to test this– very wide, due for cycle lane striping. I pushed for this to Vancouver city staff, but no action to date.

Last week I wrote about the silent, ongoing crash of fish stocks all over the world, with some scientists provocatively predicting the end of seafood as we know it by 2048.

“Overfishing is the biggest problem our oceans face,” says John Nightingale, president of the Vancouver Aquarium.

“Quite simply, our marine species cannot reproduce fast enough to keep up with the hunt.”

How can we save our children from being reduced to eating jellyfish sandwiches and algae soup? By catching fewer fish today and protecting some of our fish stocks for tomorrow. Cutting harvesting by half is one answer recommended by experts who have studied declining fish populations.

Setting up a network of Marine Protected Areas (MPA) is another answer, which would seem to be much easier to do, especially if we view it as a strategic investment in our economic future.


What an MPA can do is provide a breeding ground for endangered fish. All we have to do is keep our hooks and nets at bay, and wealth and future jobs will be created, at no cost to us, as sea life does what comes naturally—it multiplies. Unlike building a new port or airport– and taking a big risk that global freight and tourists will keep coming in an age of high-priced, declining oil– protecting a fertile marine area has a guaranteed return: we know wealth will be created there.


The effectiveness of a protected area has been vividly illustrated at Whytecliffe Park in West Vancouver. The diving area there had been reduced to a barren nest of hooks and lines when the Vancouver Aquarium, World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) led an initiative to shut it to fishing as a “research fishing closure” in 1993. Today it and another nearby closed area off Lighthouse Park host thriving marine ecosystems, protected by their proximity to shore and a big community of divers.


Under the Oceans Act, the federal government can protect a coastal or oceanic area to conserve what’s living in it.

That’s the easy part. It quickly gets complicated when three federal departments and all the stakeholders all get involved— that includes Parks Canada, Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, coastal communities and First Nations.


Michele Patterson, acting VP for WWF-Canada, Pacific Region, says “Canada is a laggard in MPAs when we should be a leader. We’ve got the longest coastline and the least protection. We should have a network of MPAs along the coast.” The feds are expected to announce a new MPA in Hecate Strait on World Oceans Day (June 8) to add to the four “pilot” MPAs in existence along our coast.


The WWF and others are trying to get the province to come out with its “oceans strategy” which would include protecting seafood resources within an integrated management plan.

Ironically, some of the biggest resistance comes from fishing lobbyists, whose clients have the most to gain in the long run. As one fishing lodge operator told me: “I love the idea of a protected area, but not where we fish.”

Closer to home, Howe Sound is closed to rockfish and lingcod harvesting but, unfortunately, identifying sensitive breeding grounds only attracts poachers when there’s no enforcement.

“Our energy is still all going into planning,” says Patterson, “but we’re not considering enforcement.”


“In B.C., poaching is a major, major problem,” laments John Nightingale. “The chances of getting caught are slim to none,”

The Aquarium is considering financing a Department of Fisheries and Oceans conservation officer who will apprehend poachers and stir up publicity about the pillage of our local fish stocks. The Aquarium has found that public pressure for conservation starts with emotional engagement.


Why aren’t we spending public infrastructure investment funds on hiring fisheries enforcement officers? Each one will produce much greater economic return than a new concrete-pouring job.