Can technology solve congestion?

Find out at this event:

New Transportation Technologies for Reducing Congestion

Speaker: George Hazel, former Chairman of MRC McLean Hazel, now Adjunct Professor at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane and Chair of the Advisory Group for the Transport Research Institute at Edinburgh Napier University.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012 – 7:00pm – 9:00pm
SFU Vancouver (Room 1400)
515 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC

Admission: $10 (cash only at door). RSVP

George Hazel, based in Scotland, is an international expert in city and mobility analysis, policy advice and development and in innovative funding and delivery mechanisms. He has extensive experience of how towns and cities work, having written a book in 2004 on “Making Cities Work” and led the team which produced the Megacities Challenges report for Siemens.

Hazel will be speaking on new technologies in transportation that are being used to reduce congestion, make transportation systems more efficient, make pricing and payments more convenient, provide more travel options, and reduce trips and traffic.

A panel with local transportation expertise will add their comments: Peter Fassbender, Mayor of the City of Langley; Peter Holt, Chair at TEC Canada; and Nathan Pachal of South Fraser OnTrax

Hosted by the Sustainable Transportation Coalition, the Planning Institute of BC South Coast Chapter and SFU Continuing Studies (City Program). With generous support provided by TransLink.

The Sustainable Transportation Coalition is a group of volunteers and organizations dedicated to promoting transportation choices in Metro Vancouver, in particular building public understanding of the best options for sustainable transportation funding in the region.

Is this kind of foreign investor flipping happening here?

Diane Francis is over the top with her allegation in the Financial Post that “The condo bubbles in Toronto and Vancouver are caused by foreign speculation and are making housing unaffordable and creating financial risk for the country in terms of government-insured mortgages.”

But her allegations that there’s a tax-avoidance scam going on makes me wonder, again, what else is going on in our real estate markets that’s never discussed in public.

Why is there no one in the industry willing to stand up and talk openly about what’s really going on?

Why is there such a huge gap between public and private perception and  reports like this one that shrug off offshore speculation as a factor in our crazy real estate prices.

In that BIV article, Ryan Berlin writes: “However, while anecdotal evidence abounds, we have bad, little or no empirical evidence on the role directly played by equity gains, intergenerational transfers or foreign investors, either in shaping this region’s house prices or in affecting our purchasing power.”

This is the biggest issue facing our city right now. How is it possible that we have “bad, little or no empirical evidence” on what’s behind it?

 

 

Valuable young workers priced out of Vancouver

Intrepid urban researcher Andy Yan is careful to warn us that the plural of anecdote is not data. Indeed not. But one story is sometimes worth 1,000 statistics. There’s an economic tug-of-war going on in this city between the real estate industry and its many beneficiaries versus other industries hurt by high housing prices. Here are two stories that suggest the real estate industry is winning—at an unknown cost to the rest of the local economy.

 

The first comes from Susie Joe Dooner, National Strategic Marketing Manager at Pitney Bowes. “I graduated from UBC in 2000.  Most of my friends who love being in Vancouver got decent paying jobs after graduation and found places to rent. But once they started thinking of having a family, eight out of my core 12 friends—including doctors, lawyers, project managers– moved out of the province.

“What does this mean to our city’s future?  We educate our youth, we give them entry-level opportunities, and when they’re ready to move up in their careers and give back to their community, they are gone – doing it for other provinces.

“My friends who moved away all dream of one day coming back, but they know that they are now priced out of the market.

“I know of countless local companies who have to look elsewhere to recruit new talent.  When they post the job in Australia, London, or the U.S., they get lots of applicants excited to be in our beautiful city– until they look at the cost of moving their family here. Then they always decline. It’s nearly impossible to find senior level people who can afford to move here.”

 

The second story comes from Isabelle Plessis, described by a mutual friend as “easily the most gifted young woman I know.”

“After growing up in Vancouver, I am now about to complete my university degree at UBC, and I will not stay in Vancouver. My three older siblings — each with a professional degree – have moved out of Vancouver because of the cost of housing, limited job prospects in Vancouver, and a feeling that Vancouver is not the place for young people starting a career. Despite our strong family connections in this area, my siblings have all begun their professional lives — as a doctor, lawyer, and London School of Economics graduate – elsewhere.  The first grandchild in our family will be born this winter, 8,000 km away from grandparents on both sides.

“As I look towards my 2013 graduation, despite UBC’s outstanding Master’s and PhD programs in my field, I do not intend to apply, because I do not see the connection and opportunities in Vancouver that other locations with top-ranked universities can offer. I do not see the organizations, head offices, and companies that would offer me work here. Vancouver is too expensive and limited in its opportunities. The maximum salary in any job that I might be able to find in Vancouver would still be insufficient to buy a small home and start a life here.

“And I am not alone. My friends, many of whom are graduating this year, are leaving Vancouver right after they walk across UBC’s graduation stage – on to Quebec, Washington, California, Ontario. They each acknowledge the beauty and uniqueness of Vancouver, yet outrageous housing and living costs make it completely unaffordable for them to begin their careers here.

“And so, they leave. And I will leave. And my siblings have left. And maybe we’ll come back, someday. I’d like to live here, near my parents. But first, we’d have to win the housing lottery.”

Should the business leaders of tomorrow, who want to live and work and have families and pay income taxes here have to compete equally with real estate investors whose only interest is a safe haven for their money? What kind of a city are we creating?

Vancouver’s new enthusiasm for face to face stimulation

Is it just Vancouver, or are other cities experiencing a boom in in-person gatherings? When vancouverisawesome.com founder Bob Kronbauer told me he’d be sharing a personal story about sturgeon fishing in the Fraser River at an upcoming CreativeMornings event, I said I’d like to attend. Too bad, he said, the first 50 tickets became available at 11 am and they were taken in 30 seconds. Two subsequent ticket releases, at 4 pm and 9 pm the same day, were also snapped up.

Admittedly, it was a free event and included a breakfast (thanks to Arc’teryx, a sportswear company in search of creative employees), but the story was familiar. I remembered a similar event I attended in January that was also sold out, with 400 people, mostly under 40, gathering to hear eight story-tellers talk about “What Feeds Us” at the spectacularly renovated Salt Building in the Olympic Village in southeast False Creek.

It was hosted by Rain City Chronicles, run by two women who have volunteered their time to organize 11 storytelling nights since Dec. 2009. All but the first event have sold out, featuring a diverse roster of largely unknown Vancouverites telling stories around themes like “Luck”, “Surprise!”, “Mixed Messages” and “Border Crossings”.

“From your favourite actress to the guy who sells you coffee, we believe everyone has a great personal story to tell,” says co-organizer Karen Pinchin (can you tell she’s a former journalist?). “Our mission is to provide a community space for sharing these stories…long stories, short stories, music and beverages.”

Graphic designers (a group that connected to many of these events) Jane and Steven Cox have a similar goal with their Pecha Kucha Night in Vancouver events, which they describe as “thinking and drinking”. That’s hardly a new combination, but the new-ish Pecha Kucha format is. Like CreativeMornings, it’s an imported international formula for bringing people together in person and showcasing outstanding personalities. Originating in Tokyo in 2003 and now used for presentation nights in cities around the world, it allows each speaker 20 slides for 20 seconds each—giving the audience a glimpse into someone’s world in less than 7 minutes. The Coxes have now hosted 21 Pecha Kucha Nights in Vancouver in venues as big as the 2,700-seat Queen Elizabeth Theatre. They have all sold out ($12 a seat).

Then there are former Mayor Sam Sullivan’s Public Salons, now in their third year, packing them in at the 670-seat Playhouse. His format is reminiscent of Pecha Kucha and Rain City Chronicles: 7 or so disparate high-profile speakers at the peak of their game, telling stories. In his case, it’s an outgrowth of small dinner salons he has hosted for years, bringing together accomplished people from varied backgrounds to talk to other guests about their personal passions.

The wildly popular TED Talks on “ideas worth spreading” are another variation on this theme: scintillating speakers in a tightly-scripted format with a live audience. It’s probably no coincidence that the only Canadian city holding auditions for the 2013 TED talks is Vancouver, where twin sisters Katherine and Janet McCartney of North Vancouver-based Procreative Design Works are directors of operations and events respectively for the international organization. Last November, a TEDx local event in West Vancouver featured, again, a series of amazing people sharing their stories and passions.

And this is just the headliners. Simon Fraser University (SFU) has been organizing Philosophers Café gatherings since 1998. They’re on almost every night in cafes around town, offering “comfortable surroundings for vibrant street level discussions on burning issues of the day. No formal philosophy training required; real life experience desired.” The SFU City Program and Centre for Dialogue just launched an ongoing lunch-time series of “city conversations”. In a matter of months SFU kicks off a major Public Square initiative—still more in-person engagements on today’s broader civic and cultural issues.

Every event hosted by SFU’s Centre for Dialogue is full. Every monthly lunch hosted by Rick Peterson’s invitation-only Burgundy Luncheon Club (three speakers at 10 minutes each in a downtown business club) has sold out.

This new craving for face-to-face discussion has piqued the interest of the City of Vancouver. They’re tapping into a group called Gen Why Media with smaller-scale Re:Generation, “an intergenerational event series” where people of different ages “tell their stories of challenge and triumph in pursuit of sustainability and resiliency in their communities.” In one event young people were invited to “Bring Your Boomers”. City staff come and listen and take notes.

What’s going on here? Business people have long been keen on in-person networking events, and networking for jobs and contacts is certainly in full swing at these events—CreativeMornings puts aside 20 minutes for small-group discussions. But the younger people who typically throng to these events have other concerns. While they’re partly driven by a craving to get out of their screens—and sometimes tiny living quarters– and into the real world of physical contact, they’re also working around a dissatisfaction with traditional political and media discourse, according to Mark Winston, director of SFU’s Centre for Dialogue. Newspapers and TV don’t bring people in touch with each other like this.

Almost all these events feature a heady mix of creativity and humanitarian causes—the TEDx talk featured people like Seth Cooper, the Creative Director of the Center for Game Science at the University of Washington, who uses video games to solve difficult scientific problems. And Aaron Coret & Stephen Slen, who head up a crew of scientifically inclined skiers and snowboarders “dedicated to safe progress in action sports”. Audiences tend to leave uplifted and stimulated. Steven Cox says the goal for his Pecha Kucha Nights is for each attendee to “leave with a sense that Vancouver is a cooler city – then we’ve done our job,”

It’s not a coincidence that many of these events are linked to the strictly-upbeat website vancouverisawesome.com. It’s dedicated to “sharing positive stories about arts, culture, lifestyle and everything awesome about Vancouver. No bad news.” Younger generations face a dark future on many fronts. Getting together to meet other people who want to celebrate the positive can provide welcome relief.

Ironically, the same social media that reduce our electronic exchanges to acronym-laden banalities make these events incredibly simple to market. At no cost, in a matter of hours, an event organizer can get the viral word out to thousands of electronically-connected people and process RSVPs, seat reservations and payments automatically. Intermingling these events with the Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook and blog worlds creates a pulsing, self-organizing, marketing blob that can book a room in seconds.

Some people, like blogger Nathan Morris, trace the craving for personal contact to being raised in the suburbs: “While the suburban cul-de-sac lifestyle offered the safest environment the planet has ever seen, it also produced the most isolated and disconnected environment,” he writes in Placemakers and Newshakers. “Today’s children rarely have the freedom to roam beyond the cul-de-sac, ensuring their social lives are determined by the quality of friends on the same street, together with the nature of their scheduled social interactions beyond their neighborhood.

“The net result? Generation Y wants to be more connected and less isolated than previous generations. They manifest this desire in their full-on embrace of social media and their desire to live in places where they can be around others; i.e., the densest, most active, areas of cities.”

This might explain how these in-person gatherings address the one problem identified by the Vancouver Foundation as the biggest social issue in this city of newcomers, transients and ethnic silos– isolation. When so many people in a city are from somewhere else, when more than half have mother tongues other than English, the craving to connect with local history and personalities gets people out.

“There’s a great interest in thinking more deeply and reflectively, as well as networking and community building,” says Mark Winston. We feel less isolated when we’re physically in touch.”

Welcome to the new IPO: in-person-only events. There is hope outside the screen.

 

B.C. needs civic election contribution controls now

Recently released reports of crazy spending in Vancouver’s 2011 civic election should trigger a serious call for spending limits and donor restrictions in municipal campaigns. Amazingly, there has been little reaction. Or maybe it’s not surprising, with 70% of the populace having already given up on even bothering to vote in most civic elections.

With unlimited election spending setting new records in the City of Vancouver and one individual donation pushing that category into a separate universe, is it surprising that voter turnout remains abysmally low and voter cynicism remains disturbingly high? What is the point in voting when a few big donors so dominate the process that it’s incomprehensible that council decisions are being made without their interests being foremost?

The most egregious distortion of democracy is developer Rob McDonald’s $960,000 contribution to the NPA’s $2.5 million campaign. It’s the culmination of an escalation of single-donor amounts that many thought had hit the heights of impropriety with John LeFebvre’s $170,000 donation to Vision in the 2005 election.

For all the concern about foreign donations to environmental groups, there is no restriction on foreign, out-of-province or out-of-jurisdiction donors to any politician in B.C.

As a percentage of total campaign spending, 11 unions’ contributions to the Committee of Progressive Electors made up a whopping 79% of that party’s $360,969 campaign. That’s $280,000 aimed at getting people elected who set the pay rates for unionized city workers.

The union representing city workers threw $185,000 at Vision Vancouver’s $2.2 million campaign, an amount that will end up having far more impact than McDonald’s massive tally because Vision has the power to deliver something. Union contracts come due this term.

McDonald has to settle for thanks from the NPA’s two council members (and five other elected candidates). Vision’s 22 corporate donors who gave more than $20,000 will expect a little more than thanks.

To put this into perspective, Integrity B.C. executive director Dermod Travis points out in an article in The Tyee that in the 2009 Montreal election the biggest donation to a mayoralty campaign was $1,000. In Toronto it was $2,500. In Calgary, $5,000. All those cities have caps on donations. For a reason.

If city councillors in any Lower Mainland municipality had to excuse themselves every time a decision involving a significant donor came before council, they’d have trouble making quorum for most meetings.

Do people think this is all just fine? No. A 2010 Mustel poll found 66% of British Columbians thought unions and corporations should be prohibited from donating money to local government campaigns. Even more (74%) thought there should be limits to how much one person can donate.

Local politicians themselves are unhappy about all this. Vancouver council has unanimously requested changes such as donor limits for individuals, unions and corporations, spending limits for candidates, a ban on foreign donations and ongoing donation disclosures.

The power to fix this rests with the provincial government. Its Local Elections Task Force agreed on spending limits but dragged its feet getting them in place for the 2011 election and still hasn’t worked out what they will be. And it ignored two other crucial changes needed: a ban on corporate and union donations and a limit on individual donations. Perhaps the province is afraid that voters would expect the same rules to apply provincially

The only good news in all this is that big spending doesn’t always win. Green Party candidate Adriane Carr spent $9,475 and won a seat. COPE spent $360,969 and won one seat – on the school board.

Failure to address over-the-top municipal contributions from unions, corporations and individuals will only add to the cynicism and disillusion undermining our political processes. •

Peter Ladner (pladner@biv.com) is a founder of Business in Vancouver and a former Vancouver city councillor.


This article from Business in Vancouver April 10-16, 2012; issue 1172

 

Fare evasion on TransLink is not the issue

It’s a good thing that politicians are held to account for raising taxes. There is a lot of waste in the public sector, and it’s easy to hide it.

But it’s also a good thing that politicians are held to account for providing leadership. Unfortunately, Premier Christy Clark recently took the politically expedient back exit with her recent announcement that she would be ignoring the TransLink Mayors’ Council’s agonized call for a vehicle levy to replace a property tax increase, and called for TransLink to be audited in search of internal savings.

The call for an audit (by both the premier and the Mayors’ Council) is an obvious run for political cover. In addition to the organization’s annual audits, there’s already special audit underway. The TransLink commissioner is weeks away from delivering an efficiency audit required before a 12.5% fare increase can be approved. In 2009 the Comptroller General audited the organization, and in 2010, TransLink cut $23 million in costs.

The last time a newly-minted provincial premier nixed a vehicle levy and called for an audit was in 2001. The leader—NDP’s Ujjal Dosanjh—was subsequently defeated, and the audit reported that the revenue that could have been collected from a vehicle levy would have put transportation improvements on a firm financial footing. With that funding, the Evergreen Line could have been built years earlier for its original cost of $750 million compared to today’s cost of $1.2 billion, a saving of $450 million.

Audit-mania is really an attempt to calm vehicle drivers who feel they’re already being shafted by fuel taxes. With Metro Vancouver gas taxes approaching 50 cents a litre, the highest in Canada, they have a point. Yet the bigger problem still won’t go away: with population growing, where do we find the money for strategic investments to enhance mobility—including alternatives to high-cost driving in areas with poor transit?

That feeling of being shafted is exacerbated by two concerns: fare evasion and overspending on TransLink police. TransLink’s internal audits and two external audits have pegged system-wide fare evasion at around 5% (public perception is that it’s 10 times higher). That cost TransLink $18 million in 2010. Then there was Frances Bula’s recent revelation of the PriceWaterhouseCoopers audit showing 85% of people fined for fare evasion don’t pay, and that it’s ICBC’s responsibility for collecting, but there’s no penalty for not paying! TransLink has been calling for that to be fixed for years.

To reduce fare evasion on SkyTrain, the federal and provincial governments (not TransLink) are spending $70 million to install gates and turnstiles. The costs of operating the gates is $200,000 a year more than the increased revenue they will bring in, so that won’t improve TransLink’s finances.

The TransLink Transit Police are the subject of yet another audit- this one by the Vancouver Police Department (not released yet). The levels of pay they receive is exorbitant (4th in the province, at $80,748 average), not to mention overtime provisions that bump way too many into the $100,000-plus bracket. But their budget has been frozen, and their crime-suppression efforts deserve some credit for the 5% growth of transit passengers last year (over the 2010 Olympic highs)

Lost in all this anti-transit noise is the bigger financial management picture: in spite of overall losses of $11 million, last year’s TransLink revenues were over budget, expenses were under, and customer satisfaction is at a record high. SkyTrain continues to have the cheapest operating costs of any rapid transit system in the world, which allows it to cover operating expenses from fares alone.

What if all these audits discover that TransLink’s house really is in order?

Would that quiet the no-more-money-for-transit lobby? It’s doubtful. Drivers, especially those paying Port Mann Bridge tolls, will insist that they’re paying their share, even though the 37-km widening of Highway 1 cost $1 billion but didn’t hit anyone with new taxes.

Outrage about taxes is legitimate, but shouldn’t be the only factor in decisions that lead to more affordable transportation choices.

Do we have the courage to face the realities of our time?

The more threatening facts are, the less we want to believe them. This is a human trait that even pre-dates the travails of Galileo Galilei, the 17th century “Father of Modern Science”. You will remember he was tried by the Inquisition, found “vehemently suspect of heresy”, forced to recant, and sentenced to spend the rest of his life under house arrest until he died. His sin was holding the scientific opinion that the earth revolves around the sun, which was deemed to be contrary to Holy Scripture.

Today’s scientists spreading facts about climate change are often equally maligned in the court of public opinion, not so much because they’re wrong, but because believing them and acting on what they’re telling us will require us, like the Pope in Galileo’s time, to so radically change our lives and worldviews that we don’t even want to go there. So our life and business practices are aligned by default to the 5% of climate scientists who disagree that humans are causing the planet to heat up. We continue to act in a way that makes us part of what UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon calls a “global suicide pact.”

We find ourselves saying exactly what people would have been saying about Galileo’s discovery that the earth rotates around the sun: “Even if it is true, I’m not going to believe it.”

As SFU professor and international climate consultant Mark Jaccard points out, only with immediate action will we achieve a 65-80 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in less than four decades. Without that action, he and the world’s leading climatologists predict that global temperature will increase more than 2 degrees Celsius, resulting in what Jaccard calls “cataclysmic effects” on the ecosystems on which we depend.

Jaccard likes to quote Upton Sinclair: “It is hard to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” He was talking about the investors in Canada’s oil sands, and the politicians who benefit from that project’s huge short-term revenues (which take no account of the ecosystem costs). The current beneficiaries desperately want to distract people from the connection between oil sands expansion (tripling production in the next 20 years) and Canada’s resulting failure to ever achieve our2020 national greenhouse gas reduction targets.

Yet abandoning those targets in Canada and elsewhere in the world condemns our children to a future far more horrific than any bitumen spill in a river or in the ocean. The OECD’s recent warning of “irreversible changes that could endanger two centuries of rising living standards” is just a start. Kevin Anderson of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Research in the UK predicts that our chances of avoiding mass death —the loss of more than 90 percent of human beings—in a world 4 degrees warmer are “extremely unlikely.”

The Pembina Institute is one of many organizations struggling to make the case for investing strategically to reject our global suicide pact. It’s urging B.C. businesses to support the extension of the province’s carbon tax. Pricing GHG emissions is, according to the OECD, “an essential element of any comprehensive [emission reduction] strategy.” It gets the market working in a life-saving direction.

Do we have the courage to face the realities of our time? One of those realities is the disruption of the revenue sources many of us currently depend on. Equally real are the myriad business opportunities coming from investing in a future that will nourish, not kill, our children.

One small step you can take to show your “courage to face the realities of our time” is to join the 94 business leaders calling on the provincial government to reaffirm and strengthen its leadership on climate change. Sign up at http://www.pembina.org/pub/2300.

This column first appeared in Business in Vancouver, March, 2011, www.biv.com

(Due to unexpected privacy and legal concerns, the conclusion to last week’s column on the CRA/RCMP raid on Angus McAllister’s home and office has been postponed to a future issue.)

8/10 top manufacturers in Vancouver are in food biz

Who knew food so dominated (what’s left of) manufacturing in the City of Vancouver?
The 8 food (and drink) manufacturers ranking in the top 10 in the city are, in order, Canadian Fishing Company, Purdy’s Chocolates, Hallmark Poultry Processors, Sofina Foods, Molson Coors Canada, Lantic Inc./Rogers Sugar, Sunrise Soya Foods, Hon’s Wun-Tun House.
Details below are from this week’s Business in Vancouver newspaper (www.biv.com- content available online to subscribers only):
Biggest manufacturers in Vancouver
Ranked by total local staff
Rank ’12 Company
Address
Year founded/
Head office
Top local executive(s) Products No. local staff ’12/’11
1 Canadian Fishing Company
Foot of Gore Ave, Vancouver V6A 2Y7
P: 604-681-0211 F: 604-681-3277 www.goldseal.ca
1906
Vancouver
Dan Nomura, president Fresh, frozen, canned and smoked salmon; herring roe; groundfish fillets, halibut and other fish products 1,273
1,273
2 Purdy’s Chocolates
2777 Kingsway, Vancouver V5R 5H7
P: 604-454-2777 F: 604-301-4402 www.purdys.com
1907
Vancouver
Karen Flavelle, CEO
Peter Higgins, president
Chocolates, fresh nuts (roasted onsite) 631
422
3 Hallmark Poultry Processors Ltd
1756 Pandora St, Vancouver V5L 1M1
P: 604-254-9885 F: 604-254-7039 www.hallmarkpoultry.com
1975
Vancouver
Clifford Pollon, president Poultry for processing: fresh chicken, chilled and frozen 4501
450
4 General Paint Corp
950 Raymur Ave, Vancouver V6A 3L5
P: 604-253-3131 F: 604-253-1169 www.generalpaint.com
1911
Vancouver
Dale Constantinoff, president and CEO Paints and related products 350
350
4 Sofina Foods Inc
8385 Fraser St, Vancouver V5X 3X8
P: 604-668-5800 F: 604-668-5900 www.sofinafoods.com
NP
Markham, ON
Mindy Mudhar, plant manager Meat products 350
350
6 Molson Coors Canada (Vancouver Brewery)
1550 Burrard St, Vancouver V6J 3G5
P: 604-664-1786 F: 604-664-1786 www.molsoncoors.com
17862
Etobicoke, ON
Rene Holt, brewery manager Molson Canadian 150
150
7 Lantic Inc/Rogers Sugar
PO Box 2150, Vancouver V6B 3V2
P: 604-253-1131 F: 604-253-2517 www.lantic.ca
1890
Montreal
Doug Emek, general manager Refined sugars (excl. cane and beet) 137
148
8 Sunrise Soya Foods
729 Powell St, Vancouver V6A 1H5
P: 604-253-2326 F: 604-251-1083 www.sunrise-soya.com
1956
Vancouver
Peter Joe, CEO Tofu, soy beverages 1001
100
9 Ocean Construction Supplies Ltd
1280 77th Ave W, Vancouver V6B 3W6
P: 604-261-2211 F: 604-261-7537 www.oceanconcrete.com
NP
NP
Larry Baloun, vice-president and general manager Ready-mix concrete 1003
1004
10 Hon’s Wun-Tun House (2011) Ltd
418 Alexander Street, Vancouver V6A 1C5
P: 604-688-0871 F: 604-254-6220 www.hons.ca
1972
Vancouver
Ray Leung, president and CEO Prepared food, Asian noodle products, potstickers 61
NP
11 Boardroom ECO Apparel
1201 Franklin St, Vancouver V6A 1L2
P: 604-718-7808 F: 604-717-8028 www.boardroomecoapparel.com
1996
Vancouver
Mark Trotzuk, president Environmentally conscious fashion apparel, active wear and corporate apparel 58
61
12 Pacific Bindery Services Ltd
870 Kent Ave SW, Vancouver V6P 6Y6
P: 604-873-4291 F: 604-875-8006 www.pacificbindery.com
1972
Vancouver
Kris Bovay, general manager Bookbinding, finishing, packaging, fulfillment 51
50
13 Trumps Fine Food Merchants & Wholesalers
646 Powell St, Vancouver V6A 1H4
P: 604-732-8473 F: 604-732-8433 www.trumpsfood.com
1987
Vancouver
Heather Angel, managing director Bakery products: fresh, frozen, shelf-stable 45
45
14 Kryton International Inc
1645 East Kent Ave, Vancouver V5P 2S8
P: 604-324-8280 F: 604-324-8899 www.kryton.com
1973
Vancouver
Kari Yuers, president and CEO
Kevin Yuers, vice-president
Wide range of products designed to waterproof, repair and protect concrete structures 39
45
15 Arkwel Industries Ltd
3642 Commercial St, Vancouver V5N 4G2
P: 604-879-7090 F: 604-879-7044 www.arkwel.com
1976
Vancouver
William Walker, president
Howie Archibald, Controller
Alan Walker, vice-president
Paper boxes, cartons, die-cutting, die-embossing, laminating 37
38
Sources: Interviews with above companies and BIV research. NP Not provided NR Not ranked 1 – 2011 figure 2 – Vancouver Brewery founded 1958 3 – BIV estimate 4 – 2010 figure